스텝포드 와이프 The Stepford Wives, 2004.

스텝포드 와이프 The Stepford Wives , 2004.https://movie.naver.com/movie/bi/mi/basic.naver?code=38799 스텝포드 와이프 The Stepford Wives , 2004.https://movie.naver.com/movie/bi/mi/basic.naver?code=38799

Stepford Wife CEO Joanna Ebert (Nicole Kidman) has a huge sensation for each program she plans…movie.naver.com Stepford Wife CEO Joanna Ebert (Nicole Kidman) has a huge sensation for each program she plans…movie.naver.com

 

Nanapyeong store: 00/5 Nanapyeong store: 00/5

Traces: Stepford Wife, not sure how far to write your impressions, so try to separate the subject like this. It was very inconvenient and I was really curious about the movie. I don’t like movies that require too much of a particular idea. No matter how clear my opinion is and how clear I am, I like works that create room for various interpretations and create an atmosphere for free conversation, and works that strongly instill certain ideas in anyone’s eyes cause opposition. Traces: Stepford Wife, not sure how far to write your impressions, so try to separate the subject like this. It was very inconvenient and I was really curious about the movie. I don’t like movies that require too much of a particular idea. No matter how clear my opinion is and how clear I am, I like works that create room for various interpretations and create an atmosphere for free conversation, and works that strongly instill certain ideas in anyone’s eyes cause opposition.

Stepford Wife is a film that is obvious to talk about. I will review it without my strong opinion as much as possible. Actually, I can’t do that. I thought I’d think this way from the moment I decided to review the movie, or actually watch it. From various perspectives, it may be a delightful movie for someone, an inconvenient movie for someone, or an irritating movie for someone. Let’s assume that there is a couple who have a very clear difference between superiority and inferiority regardless of gender. There are A and B. The ordinary society in the movie consists of a society in which A is generally inferior to B. They seemed to acknowledge each other’s relationship, but it didn’t seem to be the case. A seems to have always kept in mind that B has the upper hand over him. Stepford Wife is a film that is obvious to talk about. I will review it without my strong opinion as much as possible. Actually, I can’t do that. I thought I’d think this way from the moment I decided to review the movie, or actually watch it. From various perspectives, it may be a delightful movie for someone, an inconvenient movie for someone, or an irritating movie for someone. Let’s assume that there is a couple who have a very clear difference between superiority and inferiority regardless of gender. There are A and B. The ordinary society in the movie consists of a society in which A is generally inferior to B. They seemed to acknowledge each other’s relationship, but it didn’t seem to be the case. A seems to have always kept in mind that B has the upper hand over him.

So when B loses his social status, he goes to a new town, and the name of the new town is Stepford. But Stepford is strange. It appears that A, who had been in the inferior position, acts like a servant to B. As a robot, it reaches the level where A reigns. It is a pleasant, unpleasant and ambiguous movie in which a questioned B eventually overturns the society. So when B loses his social status, he goes to a new town, and the name of the new town is Stepford. But Stepford is strange. It appears that A, who had been in the inferior position, acts like a servant to B. As a robot, it reaches the level where A reigns. It is a pleasant, unpleasant and ambiguous movie in which a questioned B eventually overturns the society.

That’s what I feel. I thought too much about the situation I was in (not even in fact) than I thought. Society wasn’t as bad for me as I thought, and society wasn’t as bad for me as I thought. In the previous post, there was a content that worried about the superiority of the relationship, but there is a difference in the superiority of the relationship unconditionally regardless of gender or age. And there are certain points that can be fully agreed upon even if they are in the ranks. Sometimes we are subordinated and have the upper hand. It’s not fixed. You don’t have to pretend to be inferior/dominated by fixing certain classes and specific gender. Unfortunately, the world is unfair. But there is certainly a part where order is given because of its unfairness, and “maintained” because everyone is not the same. Being someone’s helper can sometimes be more important than being the subject in a sense. This is because it takes more training to help and understand one person silently than anyone else. We have instincts. There is a difference in power between us from birth. We are born with different intelligence. Other things can change acquiredly from birth, but it is not easy. Why do you ask me to change what I was born from birth and what I think? Why do you think something different from me is wrong and try to get rid of it? That’s what I feel. I thought too much about the situation I was in (not even in fact) than I thought. Society wasn’t as bad for me as I thought, and society wasn’t as bad for me as I thought. In the previous post, there was a content that worried about the superiority of the relationship, but there is a difference in the superiority of the relationship unconditionally regardless of gender or age. And there are certain points that can be fully agreed upon even if they are in the ranks. Sometimes we are subordinated and have the upper hand. It’s not fixed. You don’t have to pretend to be inferior/dominated by fixing certain classes and specific gender. Unfortunately, the world is unfair. But there is certainly a part where order is given because of its unfairness, and “maintained” because everyone is not the same. Being someone’s helper can sometimes be more important than being the subject in a sense. This is because it takes more training to help and understand one person silently than anyone else. We have instincts. There is a difference in power between us from birth. We are born with different intelligence. Other things can change acquiredly from birth, but it is not easy. Why do you ask me to change what I was born from birth and what I think? Why do you think something different from me is wrong and try to get rid of it?

All the problems are so. Life as a woman and life as a man are generally different. They have different instincts, different powers, and different brain development. That’s why the word “like” and “like” coexist. They say “like” to ordinary people, so there are certainly exceptions, so they respect them with the word “like.” Language also gives us room, but I don’t understand why we are so determined to have fixed values and to try to eliminate those that are not. Everything can be a line of common sense Of course, it is also true that the scope of common sense cannot be determined accurately. Therefore, they sometimes feel the importance of principles. It is true that he is cautious while writing a blog. Because my opinion is important and important, other people’s thoughts are also important. Therefore, we hope that a more bold, free and acceptable forum for dialogue will be prepared. Stepford Wife’s workmanship is immeasurable. If the movie shows too much intention, the rating cannot be lowered. Rather than trying to make a movie, he used it as a means to strongly assert an idea. It’s against the standards of art works that I think. Oh, all the problems are like that. Life as a woman and life as a man are generally different. They have different instincts, different powers, and different brain development. That’s why the word “like” and “like” coexist. They say “like” to ordinary people, so there are certainly exceptions, so they respect them with the word “like.” Language also gives us room, but I don’t understand why we are so determined to have fixed values and to try to eliminate those that are not. Everything can be a line of common sense Of course, it is also true that the scope of common sense cannot be determined accurately. Therefore, they sometimes feel the importance of principles. It is true that he is cautious while writing a blog. Because my opinion is important and important, other people’s thoughts are also important. Therefore, we hope that a more bold, free and acceptable forum for dialogue will be prepared. Stepford Wife’s workmanship is immeasurable. If the movie shows too much intention, the rating cannot be lowered. Rather than trying to make a movie, he used it as a means to strongly assert an idea. It’s against the standards of art I think. Ah.

The image does not exist. The image does not exist.

I wasn’t very interested in people like Nicole Kidman who had a strong impression. It’s so pretty. I wasn’t very interested in people like Nicole Kidman who had a strong impression. It’s so pretty.

She’s a lovely, beautiful person. She’s a lovely, beautiful person.

That’s it. That’s it.